Real-World Example

Student Grades Pie Chart Example

Visualize how final grades are distributed in a typical college course to understand class-wide academic performance.

Example Chart

Interactive preview with real data

Live Preview
My Pie Chart Data
CategoryValuePercentage
Category A3030.0%
Category B2525.0%
Category C2020.0%
Category D1515.0%
Category E1010.0%

Categories

5

Total Value

100

Chart Type

pie

Chart Settings

0°

Export Chart

Includes watermark

Free exports include a small "Made with pie-chart-generator.com" watermark.

Already purchased?

Edit the Data

Modify the example or enter your own data

Label
Value
%
Live preview active
Total: 100

The Data in This Chart

Final Grade Distribution — Introduction to Statistics (N=150)

28%34%22%10%
SliceValueShare of the pieAngle
A (90-100%)2828%100.8°
B (80-89%)3434%122.4°
C (70-79%)2222%79.2°
D (60-69%)1010%36°
F (Below 60%)66%21.6°
Total100100%360°
About This Data

Sample data modeled after typical grade distributions in introductory-level college STEM courses at U.S. universities.

Note: Grade thresholds follow a standard 10-point scale. Plus/minus grades are consolidated into letter grade bands. N represents total enrolled students who completed the course.

Key Insights from This Data

B Is the Most Common Grade

At 34% of all grades, B is the modal grade in this course. This is consistent with national data showing grade inflation trends where B has replaced C as the most common college grade.

A Majority Earned a B or Higher

A combined 62% of students earned an A or B, suggesting that the course material and instruction are effectively supporting student learning for the majority of the class.

Failure Rate Is Within Normal Range

The 6% F rate is within the typical 5-15% range for introductory STEM courses. Identifying at-risk students earlier through midterm assessments could help reduce this further.

Best Practices for This Chart Type
  • Use a traffic-light color scheme (green for A, yellow for C, red for F) for intuitive interpretation of performance levels.
  • Always include the total number of students (N) in the title or caption for statistical context.
  • Order grades from highest to lowest (A through F) rather than by frequency for logical consistency.
  • Add the course name and semester to the title so the chart can stand alone in reports.
  • Include a comparison to departmental or institutional averages if available.
  • Anonymize all data and present only aggregated distributions, never individual student performance.

Frequently Asked Questions