Understand how a development team distributes its engineering capacity across concurrent projects and initiatives.
Interactive preview with real data
| Category | Value | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Category A | 30 | 30.0% |
| Category B | 25 | 25.0% |
| Category C | 20 | 20.0% |
| Category D | 15 | 15.0% |
| Category E | 10 | 10.0% |
Categories
5
Total Value
100
Chart Type
pie
Go Pro — $7.99
No watermark, transparent BG, hi-res 2x, premium palettes
Free exports include a small "Made with piechartgenerator.com" watermark. Go Pro for $7.99
Modify the example or enter your own data
Total Value
100
Categories
Manual: Add categories one by one with custom colors
Paste: Copy from Excel or Google Sheets (Label, Value format)
CSV: Upload any CSV file with your data
Illustrative data based on common resource allocation patterns observed in mid-stage software companies (50-200 employees).
Note: Percentages represent full-time equivalent (FTE) allocation, not headcount. Some team members split time across multiple projects.
The Product Redesign consumes 35% of engineering capacity, reflecting its strategic importance. Concentrating resources on a key initiative typically yields better results than spreading effort thinly.
At 20%, the API Platform allocation shows a commitment to building foundational infrastructure that enables future product development and third-party integrations.
Allocating 15% to tech debt and maintenance is considered healthy. Industry best practices suggest 15-20% to prevent accumulated technical debt from slowing down new development.
The 5% allocation to research and experimentation ensures the team stays innovative without overcommitting resources away from delivery-focused projects.